Turn incidents and security findings into prioritized work

Every monitoring tool you connect sends alerts, and a lot of them end up in email. Sorting out which ones actually matter usually means reading through the whole pile by hand.

Pipe reports from monitoring, dependency, and code-quality tools to your agent via Zapier, n8n, or similar webhooks and scheduled workflows. It removes duplicates, groups related issues, attaches relevant logs and links, and creates prioritized remediation tasks for engineering review.

What the agent starts with

Ten alerts from three tools, sitting in the Timestripe inbox.

They arrive there by email. Your Timestripe inbox has an address, and an n8n workflow forwards anything that lands under the alerts label in Gmail. The agent never touches the mailbox — it reads the inbox through the CLI, the same way it reads a board.

Three problems in the pile are reported twice:

A vulnerable dependency. Dependabot reports CVE-2022-29217 in PyJWT 2.3.0. Sentry, separately, reports InvalidAlgorithmError thirty-one times in a day from the code that calls it.
A token signing mismatch. Bandit flags a hardcoded fallback secret in services/payments/tokens.py. Sentry reports a spike of expired-token errors in the same file, starting the day of a deploy.
An unbounded export. Sentry reports timeouts in services/api/export.py. Ruff reports the same function for complexity and a missing row limit.

Not set up yet? Connect your AI agent to Timestripe

The prompt

Read the alerts in my Timestripe inbox. They come from Dependabot, Sentry
and our linter.

Deduplicate by root cause — the same problem reported by two tools is one
item. Group by affected service.

Create a goal per group in the Review queue on the "Security review" board. Name it after the fix, not the alert. Put each fix in a subgoal.
In the description: severity, the affected service, every source alert,
and the log lines that matter.

Order by exploitable in production, then customer-facing, then everything
else. Skip anything below that and tell me the count.

What comes back

Three tasks, from ten alerts.

They come back in order: the JWT bug first, because token verification can be defeated from outside; the payments work under it, customer-facing but not an attack path; the dependency upgrade last.

Each carries its fixes as subgoals — six across the three — so an engineer ticks off the change they made, not the whole finding. Under that sits the evidence: severity, the affected service, the source alerts linked back to the messages they came from, and the log lines.

Every line in a description traces to an alert you can open.

August 14